Critical Texts IV: 3 (1987): 27-30

As long as Rajchman’s “freedom” is open to the same radical nominalist analysis as Foucault’s “madness,” Rajchman faces a difficulty exactly parallel to the one he attributes to Foucault.

Seiple-Rajchman review rev format

Download PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *